Micromorphological Study of Epidermis and Stomata in Some Stachys L. Species (Lamiaceae) From Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Plant and Animal Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences and Technology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

2 Natural Resources Research Division, Isfahan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Stachys L. is a taxonomically complex and morphologically diverse genus within Lamiaceae, comprising nearly 300 species worldwide, including 34 species reported from Iran. Despite its ecological significance and traditional medicinal uses, the micromorphological characteristics of its leaf surfaces, particularly the epidermis and stomata, have not been thoroughly investigated. In this study, 15 species of Stachys were analyzed using light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to explore their epidermal and stomatal features. Measurements included stomatal length, width, and stomatal index (SI) alongside qualitative assessments of surface ornamentation and stomatal types. The largest stomata were observed in S. pilosa, whereas S. ixodes had the highest SI and S. obtusicrena the lowest. All species exhibited irregular epidermal cell outlines and a combination of anisocytic and diacytic stomatal types. These micromorphological characters, particularly when interpreted in combination with other morphological data, provide informative characters that can aid in the taxonomic identification and classification of Stachys species.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Introduction

The mint family, Lamiaceae, includes more than 230 genera and over 7,000 species, making it one of the largest families of flowering plants with a broad global distribution (Harley et al., 2004; Zhao et al., 2021). This family is well known for its characteristic floral structure, square stems, and aromatic members, and the Mediterranean region is still considered one of its primary centers of diversity (Bhattacharjee, 1980).

Among its members, Stachys L. stands out due to its high morphological diversity and taxonomic complexity, with more than 300 species described worldwide (Harley et al., 2004; Salmaki et al., 2012). These species range from annual and perennial herbs to subshrubs, exhibiting considerable variation in vegetative and reproductive features (Lindqvist & Albert, 2002). In addition to these traits, many species of Stachys have been used in traditional medicine, and various studies have confirmed their antioxidant, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory properties (Tundis et al., 2014; Giuliani et al., 2008).

In Iran, Stachys has been studied in several taxonomic works. Rechinger (1982) recorded 47 species, including 25 endemics, while Jamzad (2012) revised this number to 38. These numbers suggest that Iran plays an important role in the distribution and diversity of the genus in the region. However, separating species based on morphology remains problematic, as many characters’ overlap or vary within species. To improve species identification, researchers have turned to micromorphological features, especially those visible under scanning electron microscopy (SEM), such as trichome types (Salmaki et al., 2009), pollen morphology (Salmaki et al., 2008a) and nutlet surfaces (Salmaki et al., 2008b).

Some recent studies from Turkey have also provided valuable data, Dogu (2021) examined the anatomy and pollen of S. longiflora, and Gerçek et al. (2022) studied trichomes and secondary compounds in S. rizeensis R.Bhattacharjee. Despite this progress, the structure of leaf epidermis and stomata in Stachys, especially in Iranian species, has not been studied in detail. These characteristics, such as stomatal size, type, and density, are often stable and less affected by environmental conditions, which makes them useful for taxonomy.

This study examines these features in 15 Iranian Stachys species using both light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The aim is to provide clear and valuable information to help distinguish species more easily and better understand their variation.

 

Materials and Methods

Plant material and sample selection

The taxonomy of the selected taxa was reviewed based on established literature (Rechinger, 1982; Jamzad, 2012). The plant specimens utilized in this study were obtained from the herbarium of the Isfahan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center (SFAHAN). For each Stachys species examined, a minimum of three herbarium specimens from distinct populations was included in the analysis. Detailed information regarding the collected species is presented in Table 1.

 

Light microscopy (LM)

For light microscopy analysis, a minimum of three samples from each population was examined. Leaves were selected from equivalent positions along the stem to maintain consistency among specimens. The samples were initially immersed in a 3:1 solution of acetic acid and ethanol for 24 to 48 hours to soften the leaf tissues. They were then transferred into a 1:1 mixture of hydrogen peroxide and acetic acid and subjected to heating at 80–100°C for 10 minutes to eliminate pigmentation and enhance the clarity of epidermal structures. Following this treatment, the samples were thoroughly rinsed with distilled water and prepared for epidermal peeling. The method used for preparing and clearing the leaf epidermis followed standard protocols described by Stace (1984) with minor modifications. Given the high density of trichomes, which could obstruct the visibility of stomata, the trichomes were carefully removed using styrofoam. A thin section of the abaxial leaf epidermis was then dissected and mounted on glass slides. The prepared samples were observed and documented using a light microscope (LM) under 40× magnification.

 

 

Table 1. Table 1. Information on the studied Stachys specimens, including species names, herbarium numbers, and collection details. Herbarium numbers marked with an asterisk (*) were used for SEM analysis.

Species Name

Herb. NO.

Location, Collector(s), Date

S. acerosa Boiss.

17719

Isfahan, Khansar, Golestankooh; Akhavan & Bagheri, 31 May 2018

5158

Isfahan, Tiran; Norouzi, 4 May 1987

14685*

Isfahan, Najafabad, Tiran; Shams, Janighorban, 31 May 2004

S. aucheri Benth.

17720*

Isfahan, Khansar, Golestankooh; Akhavan & Bagheri, 25 June 2018

10337

Isfahan, Fereydunshahr; Feizi & Asfa, 25 June 1994

14409

Shahrekord, Saman; Shams & Janighorban, 25 July 2004

S. ballotiformis Vatke

16606*

Isfahan, Fereydunshahr, Poshtkooh; Akhavan & Bagheri, 8 June 2018

S. benthamiana Boiss.

12680

Isfahan, Fereydunshahr; Feizi & Shams, 5 June 2000

12555*

Isfahan, Golpayegan, Hendeh; Feizi & Shams, 1 May 2000

2998

Isfahan, Semirom, Padena; Norouzi, 1 June 1983

S. byzantina K.Koch

13718*

Isfahan, Najafabad; Aslani, 24 June 2007

11243

Mazandaran, Kelardasht; Norouzi, 25 July 1996

S. inflata Benth.

11593

Isfahan, Semirom; Shams, Janighorban & Feizi, 27 May 1998

4985

Shahrekord, Lordegan; Norouzi & Ebrahimi, 5 June 1986

17721*

Isfahan, Khansar, Golestankooh; Akhavan & Bagheri, 31 May 2018

S. ixodes Boiss. & Hausskn.

10732

Isfahan, Natanz, Wargoran,; Faizi & Shams 30 May 1995

14839*

Fars, Eqlid; Norouzi, 13 May 2000

S. kurdica Boiss. & Hohen.

3809

Isfahan, Semirom; Norouzi, 1 May 1985

3638

Isfahan, Semirom; Norouzi, 13 May 1985

4851*

Isfahan, Fereydunshahr; Janighorban, 26 May 1986

S. lavandulifolia Vahl.

13322

Isfahan, Fereydan, Bagh Nazar; Norouzi & Yazdani, 27 May 2002

1003*

Isfahan, Chadegan; Norouzi, Etemadi & Baba Rabie, 22 June 1981

2431

Isfahan, Shahrekord, Gardaneh Rokh; Norouzi, 16 May 1983

S. obtusicrena Boiss.

15465*

Isfahan, Semirom; Feizi, 6 June 2001

S. pilifera Benth.

14147

Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari, Borujen, Sabzkooh; Norouzi, 1 June 2003

14662*

Isfahan, Khansar, Fereydan; Shams, Janighorban, 17 June 2004

2908

Isfahan, Semirom; Norouzi, 10 June 1983

S. pilosa Nutt.

14997*

Isfahan, Fereydunshahr; Nekukho, 11 July 2007

S. setifera C.A.Mey.

10386*

Isfahan, Fereydan; Feizi & Asafa 26 June 1994

12853

Isfahan, Zarrin Shahr, Bagh Bahadoran; Norouzi, 20 March 2007

12040

Isfahan, Morche Khort, Meymeh; Norouzi & Shams, 6 September 1998

S. spectabilis Choisy ex DC.

5691*

Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari, Kouhrang, Cheshmeh Dimeh; Norouzi & Akhbari, 13 June 1988

S. tomentosa Benth.

14268

Isfahan, Semirom, Hana; Shams, 1 June 2004

12774*

Isfahan, Fereydan; Feizi, Shams, 7 June 2000

12604

Isfahan, Fereydan, Ghal'eh Bahman; Feizi & Shams, 15 May 2000

 

 

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was conducted to obtain high-resolution images of leaf surface structures at the Faculty of Materials Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology. Small leaf sections were carefully mounted onto aluminum stubs using double-sided adhesive tape. To enhance conductivity, a 10-nanometer layer of gold was applied to the samples using a sputter coater. This thin metallic coating did not alter the surface morphology of the samples. Imaging was performed at magnifications of 20×, 50×, 100×, and 200× to visualize fine epidermal features in detail.

 

Stomatal counting, index calculation, and data analysis

To assess stomatal density and the number of epidermal cells, images captured at 40× magnification under light microscopy were analyzed. The stomatal index (SI) was calculated using the following formula (Zhu et al., 2021):

Stomatal Index = Number of stomata / (Number of epidermal cells + Number of stomata) × 100

Quantitative measurements of epidermal traits were carried out using Digimizer software. Mean values and standard deviations for stomatal length and width were computed, and the data were organized into tables using Microsoft Excel. For each species, the arrangement of epidermal cells and the orientation of guard cells were examined and recorded. To evaluate interspecific differences in stomatal size, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to stomatal length and width. Tukey’s HSD test was used to identify statistically significant differences among species.

 

Results

In the present study, micromorphological characters of 15 Stachys species were analyzed through both quantitative (stomatal length, width, and density) and qualitative (epidermal surface type and stomatal arrangement) assessments. Considerable variation was observed across species in stomatal morphology and epidermal characteristics. Differences in epidermal surface features were noted (Table 2); for instance, glandular epidermal structures were identified in species such as S. acerosa and S. setifera, whereas others displayed either smooth or ribbed epidermal surfaces. Despite these differences, irregularly shaped epidermal cells were consistently observed in all species. Light microscopy (LM) images (Fig. 1) confirmed these variations, while scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images (Fig. 2) provided detailed visualizations of epidermal ornamentation and stomatal structures. Interspecific differences in stomatal dimensions, stomatal index, and density were also significant (Table 3). The largest stomatal length and width were recorded in S. pilosa, while S. obtusicrena exhibited the smallest stomatal dimensions. The arrangement of epidermal cells surrounding guard cells was identified as anisocytic and diacytic in all species examined. The highest stomatal index was observed in S. ixodes, whereas the lowest value was recorded in S. obtusicrena. These findings emphasize substantial interspecific variability in stomatal and epidermal micromorphology, highlighting their potential taxonomic relevance in distinguishing Stachys species. Statistical analysis supported these observations. One-way ANOVA revealed highly significant differences among species in both stomatal length and width (p < 0.001). According to Tukey’s HSD test, S. pilosa, S. ixodes, and S. tomentosa exhibited significantly larger stomata compared to species such as S. acerosa and S. inflata. These results confirm that stomatal dimensions serve as reliable characters for distinguishing species within Stachys. The patterns of variation are also illustrated in Fig. 3.

 

Table 2. Epidermal surface characteristics observed in the studied Stachys species.

Species Name

Glandular Epidermis

Smooth Epidermis

Ribbed Epidermis

Stachys acerosa

 

 

Stachys aucheri

 

Stachys ballotiformis

 

 

Stachys benthamiana

 

 

Stachys byzantina

 

 

Stachys inflata

 

 

Stachys ixodes

 

 

Stachys kurdica

 

Stachys lavandulifolia

 

 

Stachys obtusicrena

 

 

Stachys pilifera

 

 

Stachys pilosa

 

 

Stachys setifera

 

 

Stachys spectabilis

 

 

Stachys tomentosa

 

 

 

Microscopic images provided a general overview of epidermal and stomatal characteristics in the examined Stachys species (Fig. 1). Surface ornamentation, including glandular, ribbed, and smooth epidermal structures, was illustrated through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Fig. 2).  Light microscopy (LM) images revealed stomatal types and the arrangement of epidermal cells. Stomatal dimensions were measured based on SEM observations, while the structural features of guard cells were identified using LM.

 

Table 3. Quantitative stomatal characters were measured in the studied Stachys species, including sample size (N), stomatal dimensions (length and width, presented as mean ± standard deviation and minimum-maximum range), epidermal cell count, and stomatal index (%).

Species

N

Length (µm)

Width (µm)

Epidermal Cells Count

Stomatal Index (%)

S. acerosa

7

28.8 ± 1.95 (25.37–30.82)

22.8 ± 1.3 (20.81–23.67)

65

10.9

S. aucheri

5

101.8 ± 7.54 (92.32–114.31)

75.2 ± 2.03 (73.37–78.45)

64

7.2

S. ballotiformis

6

87.5 ± 5.32 (77.41–101.19)

68.5 ± 2.34 (52.46–77.32)

63

17.8

S. benthamiana

7

44.7 ± 1.29 (42.69–46.35)

31.2 ± 1.57 (29.75–34.02)

96

11.1

S. byzantina

7

107.7 ± 9.52 (92.63–117.13)

68.3 ± 9.5 (62.95–79.22)

75

17.5

S. inflata

6

19.6 ± 2.13 (15.64–22.12)

14.8 ± 2.1 (13.68–18.0)

87

15.5

S. ixodes

6

124.5 ± 12.15 (119.82–154.1)

106.8 ± 10.18 (92.87–119.37)

47

24.1

S. kurdica

4

113.6 ± 5.52 (104.49–119.95)

70.8 ± 5.1 (63.59–77.64)

22

15.3

S. lavandulifolia

7

28.6 ± 1.04 (27.67–30.45)

22.3 ± 1.94 (19.54–25.3)

74

8.6

S. obtusicrena

4

95.8 ± 15.45 (83.11–121.28)

95.9 ± 15.41 (66.85–99.63)

120

6.9

S. pilifera

6

104.2 ± 6.2 (98.79–117.67)

72.6 ± 7.1 (64.33–85.4)

85

14.1

S. pilosa

7

157.4 ± 10.36 (140.5–173.72)

118.5 ± 7.34 (110.07–133.16)

90

10.0

S. setifera

6

124.7 ± 3.5 (122.15–132.04)

81.3 ± 9.9 (68.73–99.76)

120

12.4

S. spectabilis

6

88.6 ± 6.14 (78.41–99.25)

66.8 ± 7.53 (54.73–74.25)

98

13.2

S. tomentosa

6

114.9 ± 3.15 (104.99–120.41)

74.9 ± 9.7 (70.68–79.03)

58

14.7

 

Fig. 1. Light microscopy (LM) images showing epidermal and stomatal structures in selected Stachys species. (A) Stachys acerosa, (B) S. aucheri, (C) S. ballotiformis, (D) S. benthamiana, (E) S. byzanthina, (F) S. inflata, (G) S. ixodes, (H) S. kurdica, (I) S. lavandulifolia, (J) S. obtusicrena, (K) S. pilifera, (L) S. pilosa, (M) S. setifera, (N) S. spectabilis, (O) S. tomentosa. The scale bar corresponds to 30 µm for all species, except in (C), (G), (I), (J), and (M), where it represents 60 µm.

 

Fig. 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the leaf epidermis in selected Stachys species.: (A) Stachys acerosa, (B) S. aucheri, (C) S. ballotiformis, (D) S. benthamiana, (E) S. byzantina, (F) S. inflata, (G) S. ixodes, (H) S. kurdica, (I) S. lavandulifolia, (J) S. obtusicrena, (K) S. pilifera, (L) S. pilosa, (M) S. setifera, (N) S. spectabilis, (O) S. tomentosa. The scale bar represents 50 µm for most species, except for (A), (D), and (F), where it is 20 µm, and (B), (I), and (N), where it is 100 µm.

 

Fig. 3. Boxplots illustrating variation in stomatal length (top) and width (bottom) among the studied Stachys species. Each box represents the interquartile range (IQR), with the horizontal line indicating the median value. Whiskers show the range excluding outliers, and dots represent individual outliers.

 

Discussion

The genus Stachys presents a notable taxonomic challenge due to its significant morphological diversity and the difficulty in species delimitation and subgeneric classification. Within the Lamiaceae, anatomical traits have traditionally served as consistent indicators for classification, as they are generally less influenced by environmental variability. Among these characters, foliar micromorphological features, particularly those involving the epidermis and stomata, have received increasing attention for their diagnostic and evolutionary relevance (Gul et al., 2019; Zaman et al., 2022). Despite the recognized medicinal and ecological value of Stachys, detailed micromorphological studies, especially on leaf epidermal structures, remain limited in the flora of Iran. This study addresses this knowledge gap by investigating epidermal and stomatal features in 15 Iranian Stachys species using light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), with a focus on their taxonomic utility. These micromorphological differences were also statistically supported, confirming their relevance for species-level delimitation within the genus. The results revealed considerable interspecific variation in stomatal characters. S. pilosa had the largest stomatal dimensions, while S. inflata and S. acerosa displayed the smallest. The stomatal index (SI), considered a relatively stable trait less influenced by environmental conditions, ranged from 6.9% in S. obtusicrena to 24.1% in S. ixodes. These findings are notable when compared to the other genera of the Lamiaceae, such as Mentha longifolia (L.) L. (7.3%) and Micromeria Benth. (0.4%), highlighting potential adaptive differences (Jabeen et al., 2025). All studied species exhibited irregularly shaped epidermal cells, a feature also reported in other genera of the Lamiaceae, such as Ocimum L., Lavandula L., Salvia L., and Thymus L., where it is considered a consistent taxonomic trait (Jabeen et al., 2025; Molaei et al., 2024). Regarding stomatal types, both anisocytic and diacytic stomata were present across all species, consistent with patterns reported in other genera of the Lamiaceae (Gul et al., 2019). Surface ornamentation varied among species, including smooth, ribbed, and glandular types. These characters did not exhibit a clear phylogenetic distribution but may reflect ecological adaptations. Although trichomes were not the primary focus of the current study, their taxonomic significance is well documented in genera such as Dracocephalum L. and Origanum L. Previous research has demonstrated that trichome type and density can aid in species discrimination. These findings also align with earlier anatomical studies focusing on nutlets, stems, and petioles (Salmaki et al., 2009; Dogu, 2021), offering a more integrated morphological perspective. While pollen morphology has shown limited taxonomic utility in Stachys (Salmaki et al., 2008a), the stomatal and epidermal traits highlighted in this study appear to be more effective in supporting species-level identification. The application of SEM proved especially useful in detecting micromorphological details, particularly in species with dense trichomes that hinder visibility under light microscopy. This methodological advantage has also been recognized in other investigations on Lamiaceae (Semerdjieva et al., 2023). In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of micromorphological traits, particularly those related to stomata and epidermal cells, as valuable diagnostic features in Stachys. The integration of these characters with molecular, anatomical, and ecological data is recommended to improve species delimitation and classification within this taxonomically complex genus.

 

Acknowledgment

The University of Isfahan financially supported this research. The authors would like to express their appreciation to the Herbarium of the Isfahan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center (SFAHAN) for providing access to the plant specimens utilized in this study.

Bhattacharjee, R. (1980). Taxonomic studies in Stachys II: A new infrageneric classification of Stachys L. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 38, 65–96.
Dogu, S. (2021). Anatomy, morphology, palynology and nutlet micromorphology of the rediscovered Turkish steno-endemic Stachys longiflora Boiss. & Bal. (Lamiaceae). Modern Phytomorphology, 15(4), 73–81.  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5801179
Gerçek, Y. C., Şahin, A. A., Bayram, N. E., Çelik, S., Sefalı, A., Gıdık, B., … & Pınar, N. M. (2022). Anatomy, trichome micromorphology and phytochemical profile of Stachys rizeensis R. Bhattacharjee from Turkey. South African Journal of Botany, 149, 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2022.05.046
Giuliani, C., Pellegrino, R., Tirillini, B., & Bini, L. M. (2008). Micromorphological and chemical characterisation of Stachys recta L. subsp. serpentini (Fiori) Arrigoni in comparison to Stachys recta L. subsp. recta (Lamiaceae). Flora-Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 203(5), 376-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2007.07.001
Gul, S., Ahmad, M., Zafar, M., Bahadur, S., Sultana, S., Ashfaq, S., … & Siddiq, Z. (2019). Foliar epidermal anatomy of Lamiaceae with special emphasis on their trichomes diversity using scanning electron microscopy. Microscopy Research and Technique, 82(3), 206-223. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23157
Harley, R. M., Atkins, S., Budantsev, A. L., Cantino, P. D., Conn, B. J., Grayer, R., & Harley, M. M. (2004). Labiatae. In: Kubitzki, K. (ed.), The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants (pp. 167–275). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18617-2_11
Jabeen, S., Zafar, M., Ahmad, M., Almutairi, S. M., Elshikh, M. S., Makhkamov, T., & Manzoor, M. (2025). Exploring the taxonomic relevance: foliar epidermal microanatomy of aromatic and medicinal plants within subfamily Nepetoideae. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 72, 4005–4055.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-024-02179-w
Jamzad, Z. (2012). Lamiaceae. In M. Asadi, A. A. Maassoumi, & V. Mozaffarian. (eds), Flora of Iran (Vol. 76). Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands. [In Persian].
Lindqvist, C., & Albert, V. A. (2002). Origin of the Hawaiian endemic mints within North American Stachys (Lamiaceae). American Journal of Botany, 89(10), 1709–1724. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.89.10.1709
Molaei, S., Afsharzadeh, S., & Akhavan Roofigar, A. (2024). Micromorphological study of epidermis and stomata in selected species of Salvia in central Iran. Rostaniha, 25(1), 31–48. https://rostaniha.areeo.ac.ir/article_131746.html?lang=fa [In Persian].
Rechinger, K. H. (1982). Stachys. In: Flora Iranica (Vol. 150). Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt.
Salmaki, Y., Zarre, S., Jamzad, Z., & Bräuchler, C. (2008a). Pollen morphology of Stachys (Lamiaceae) in Iran and its systematic implication. Flora-Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants203(8), 627-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2007.10.005
Salmaki, Y., Zarre, S., & Jamzad, Z. (2008b). Nutlet micromorphology and its systematic implication in Stachys L. (Lamiaceae) in Iran. Feddes Repertorium, 119(7‐8), 607–621. https://doi.org/10.1002/fedr.200811187
Salmaki, Y., Zarre, S., Govaerts, R., & Bräuchler, C. (2012). A taxonomic revision of the genus Stachys (Lamiaceae: Lamioideae) in Iran. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 170(4), 573–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2012.01317.x
Salmaki, Y., Zarre, S., Jamzad, Z., & Bräuchler, C. (2009). Trichome micromorphology of Iranian Stachys (Lamiaceae) with emphasis on its systematic implication. Flora-Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 204(5), 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2008.11.001
Semerdjieva, I., Yankova-Tsvetkova, E., Zheljazkov, V. D., Koleva-Valkova, L. H., & Nikolova, R. (2023). Reproductive capacity and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses of the micromorphological surfaces of three endemic Satureja species from Bulgaria. Plants, 12(13), 2436.  https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12132436
Stace, C. A. (1984). The taxonomic importance of the leaf surface. In V. H. Heywood, & D. M. Moore (eds), Current Concepts in Plant Taxonomy (pp. 67-94). Academic Press.
Tundis, K., Peruzzi, L., & Menichini, F. (2014). Phytochemical and biological studies of Stachys species in relation to chemotaxonomy: a review. Phytochemistry, 102, 7–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.01.023
Zaman, W., Ullah, F., Parmar, G., Saqib, S., Ayaz, A., & Park, S. (2022). Foliar micromorphology of selected medicinal Lamiaceae taxa and their taxonomic implication using scanning electron microscopy. Microscopy Research and Technique, 85(9), 3217–3236. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.24179
Zhao, F., Chen, Y. P., Salmaki, Y., Drew, B. T., Wilson, T. C., Scheen, A. C., & Xiang, C. L. (2021). An updated tribal classification of Lamiaceae based on plastome phylogenomics. BMC Biology, 19, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-020-00931-z
Zhu, C., Hu, Y., Mao, H., Li, S., Li, F., Zhao, C., & Yuan, X. (2021). A deep learning-based method for automatic assessment of stomatal index in wheat microscopic images of leaf epidermis. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 716784. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.716784